LETTER h: April 2008

April 02, 2008

How This Human Works

I bought new clothes. I look the same. I watch films. They are all different. They look different. They feel different. They make me feel like I look different. They make me look differently at the way I feel. But I'm no different. We all know that.

THE LETTER h

Nit® String Wave Supplement Manifestille / The Not-Lie: An Ideal Language

Everywhere Versus “Every Ware”, Knit Versus “Nit®”

In an ongoing attempt to clearly articulate our definitions for matter, (that is the stuff that makes up everything perceivable to our gang, including wind and rainbows) the LETTER h will occasionally manipulate language to serve our theories. In the case of “every ware”, found most deliberately used in our Nit® String Wave Declarato, we have created such a phrase to draw out the subtle differences between space and the objects that fill space. The word ‘ware’ as in ‘wares’ references these items that occupy our lives: dogs, buildings, rope, shoes, garbage bags, etc. With this distinction made, the ‘where’ in the term ‘everywhere’ takes on a more specific meaning, one attached to vast, vague and even obsolete definitions of space.

Let’s exercise the meaning of ‘ware’: When speaking about anti-matter (a deliberately negative term used to diminish its importance) the precision of our new definitions ring true. Now instead of saying “Anti-matter is everywhere.” we can say “Anti-matter is no ware.” More concisely, anti-matter is every single piece of matter that our group cannot perceive.

Similarly the word ‘Nit’ was established to specify the LETTER h goals of universal realignment through the act of knitting. When the group nits they are manipulating some control mechanism over the many miniscule strings whose vibrations determine the color of your hair and the wetness of naps and the ware of where. Nitting is the application of our ideals: An impractical kind of super-pseudo-physics, originally applied through the activity of knitting or in some cases un-knitting. However, the current applications of nitting vary greatly depending on the mood of the practitioner, the time of day and possibly the weather conditions.

Guided by the gross manipulation of scientific theory and our special brand of outrageous wishes the concept and practice of nit is closer to “not-lies” than the truth. In fact, the truth is so black of a hole that it defies a word to name it. And it is to this blackest of black holes that we assign all of our not-lies, our nitting, and our wares. Our efforts encrust its event horizon, to help define it, give it character and target our faith in it. When we discuss such events we break language down to bits, to the smallest wares and nowares. Hence we need to create an ideal language to define our wish-physics and our not-lies. Unfortunately we don’t really know how to do that…

Fortunately that won’t stop us from trying.

LETTER h

April 10, 2008

April 02, 2008

How This Human Works

THE LETTER h

History

About Us